There Are Failures

In every endeavour. Yet the viability of the whole can not always be deduced from them.

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yRPH1DHdT7I&feature=channel]

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=miRV-SgYx7Q&feature=channel]

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AV1eUeo27tc&feature=channel]

The Armstrong-Whitworth Ensign, Bristol Brabazon and Saro Princess all flew but none operated for real. Yet machines like DC-3, Lockheed Constellation or even the Boeing 707 were successful. What made these differences? Is a certain amount of failures always needed? Could the waste be avoided beforehand? Interesting questions.

This entry was posted in airplane, Architecture, industry, Motivation, Uncategorized and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to There Are Failures

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *